Thing is… you can google the case, often there will be commentary as well. All the cases we are looking at are very famous, and most of them have commentaries and summaries.
I did not point that out before because I needed to try to help you learn the IRAC method, to understand how to brief cases. I am trying to foster your argumentation skills, which is why I point out Savigny and also conceptual jurisprudence (Begriffsjurisprudenz) versus legal process interest balancing (Interessenabwägung). I am trying to help you to learn to think structurally about law. Start with text, then context, then legal history, then purposes of the law. Think in terms of public/private national/international federal/state, executive/legislative/judicial.
Please ask me if you have questions about vocabulary or concepts. Also feel free to tell me how to teach you better.